Difference between revisions of "Talk:Nspasswd"

From AOLserver Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
* This was a mistake here -- I believe you intended this node to document the nspasswd command, not this (non-Aolserver) "nspasswd" module. There is a general problem with non-aolserver code using ns_ prefix on functions and modules which makes it confusing to tell which is an official module and which is something from userspace. --[[User:Caveman|Caveman]] 09:35, 3 December 2005 (EST)
 
* This was a mistake here -- I believe you intended this node to document the nspasswd command, not this (non-Aolserver) "nspasswd" module. There is a general problem with non-aolserver code using ns_ prefix on functions and modules which makes it confusing to tell which is an official module and which is something from userspace. --[[User:Caveman|Caveman]] 09:35, 3 December 2005 (EST)
 +
 +
** Well, the nspasswd module provides the ns_passwd command.  My point was that ns_passwd seems like an "enhanced" version of the existing ns_crypt -- maybe ns_passwd should just be called ns_hash instead. ''-- [[User:Dossy|Dossy]] 23:25, 3 December 2005 (EST)''

Latest revision as of 04:25, 4 December 2005

Just another ns_crypt?

ns_passwd sounds a lot like an enhanced ns_crypt -- should they be merged together? -- Dossy 07:03, 3 December 2005 (EST)

  • This was a mistake here -- I believe you intended this node to document the nspasswd command, not this (non-Aolserver) "nspasswd" module. There is a general problem with non-aolserver code using ns_ prefix on functions and modules which makes it confusing to tell which is an official module and which is something from userspace. --Caveman 09:35, 3 December 2005 (EST)
    • Well, the nspasswd module provides the ns_passwd command. My point was that ns_passwd seems like an "enhanced" version of the existing ns_crypt -- maybe ns_passwd should just be called ns_hash instead. -- Dossy 23:25, 3 December 2005 (EST)