AOLserver Bugs and Problems - Revision history

Josephbui: Undo revision 5565 by Daniel (Talk)

2009-11-23T15:05:39Z

Undo revision 5565 by Daniel (Talk)

Mgma: Build problem with aolserver-4.5.0

2006-07-12T17:31:37Z

Build problem with aolserver-4.5.0

Caveman at 14:27, 3 December 2005

2005-12-03T14:27:58Z

Dossy at 12:10, 3 December 2005

2005-12-03T12:10:29Z

Caveman: added ns_sha1 issue

2005-12-03T05:06:25Z

added ns_sha1 issue

WikiSysop: imported from WiKit id 36

2004-07-28T01:11:41Z

imported from WiKit id 36

New page

'''Bugs should be reported using the [http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?atid=103152&group_id=3152 SourceForge Bug Tracker] for the AOLserver project.'''

----

Has anyone succesfully run 4.0.7 (or any other version) on SuSE 8 for AMD64? It appears to build OK (built against 64 bit build of Tcl 8.4.5) but when run throws a
NsTclInitObjs: sizeof(int) < sizeof(long)
Aborted
error

Thanks

Damien

[[Dossy]] 27jul2004 - ''Damien, [http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.aolserver/10802 Tomasz Kosiak] asked the same question on the AOLserver mailing list and [http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.aolserver/10804 Jim Davidson] responded that commenting out the failing check you experienced may be safe. Tomasz then [http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.aolserver/10809 replied] that he'd followed Jim's advice, and it seems to be working just fine. Once I get some time on a AMD64 system, I'll do some testing and commit the change. For now, you can either make the same change Tomasz did, or wait.''

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:31, 12 July 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Bugs should be reported using the [http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?atid=103152&group_id=3152 SourceForge Bug Tracker] for the AOLserver project.'''		'''Bugs should be reported using the [http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?atid=103152&group_id=3152 SourceForge Bug Tracker] for the AOLserver project.'''
		+
		+	----
		+
		+	12 Jul, 2006
		+
		+	Hi,
		+
		+	I'm having a compilation error when trying to build AOLserver-4.5.0. It's the first time I use AOLserver, so its probably a silly problem. Can anyone help me?
		+
		+	cl /EHsc /W3 /nologo /c /MD /O2 /D "_WINDOWS" /D "TCL_THREADS=1" /D "WIN32"
		+	/D "FD_SETSIZE=128" /D "NO_CONST=1" /D "_MBCS" /D "NDEBUG"
		+	/I "C:\Pruebas\src\aolserver-4.5.0-src\include"
		+	/I "C:\Pruebas\Tcl8.4.13\include" /c /Fodns.o
		+	dns.c
		+	dns.c
		+	dns.c(258) : error C2065: 'NI_MAXHOST' : undeclared identifier
		+	dns.c(258) : error C2057: expected constant expression
		+	dns.c(258) : error C2466: cannot allocate an array of constant size 0
		+	dns.c(258) : error C2133: 'buf' : unknown size
		+	dns.c(278) : warning C4013: 'getnameinfo' undefined; assuming extern returning
		+	int
		+	dns.c(279) : warning C4034: sizeof returns 0
		+	dns.c(280) : error C2065: 'NI_NAMEREQD' : undeclared identifier
		+	dns.c(282) : warning C4013: 'gai_strerror' undefined; assuming extern
		+	returning int
		+	dns.c(325) : error C2079: 'hints' uses undefined struct 'addrinfo'
		+	dns.c(331) : error C2224: left of '.ai_family' must have struct/union type
		+	dns.c(332) : error C2224: left of '.ai_socktype' must have struct/union type
		+	dns.c(333) : warning C4013: 'getaddrinfo' undefined; assuming extern returning
		+	int
		+	dns.c(340) : error C2037: left of 'ai_addr' specifies undefined struct/union
		+	'addrinfo'
		+	dns.c(340) : error C2198: 'ns_inet_ntoa' : too few actual parameters
		+	dns.c(341) : error C2037: left of 'ai_next' specifies undefined struct/union
		+	'addrinfo'
		+	dns.c(343) : warning C4013: 'freeaddrinfo' undefined; assuming extern
		+	returning int
		+	NMAKE : fatal error U1077: 'cl' : return code '0x2'
		+	Stop.
		+	NMAKE : fatal error U1077: 'C:\Pruebas\Tcl8.4.13\bin\tclsh84t.exe' : return
		+	code '0x1'
		+	Stop.
		+
		+	I'm using aolserver-4.5.0 with Tcl8.4.13 in Windows XP. I compiled Tcl with the options threads and thrdalloc.
		+
		+	Thanks,
		+
		+	Miguel

	----		----

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:27, 3 December 2005
Line 19:		Line 19:

	* Can you provide a short snippet of sample code (incl. sample data, and what you get as output) from ns_sha1 as well as one other library implementation, so we might be able to identify where the difference is coming from? ''-- [[User:Dossy\|Dossy]] 07:10, 3 December 2005 (EST)''		* Can you provide a short snippet of sample code (incl. sample data, and what you get as output) from ns_sha1 as well as one other library implementation, so we might be able to identify where the difference is coming from? ''-- [[User:Dossy\|Dossy]] 07:10, 3 December 2005 (EST)''
		+
		+	** Such information is on the linked [[ns_sha1]] page. --[[User:Caveman\|Caveman]] 09:27, 3 December 2005 (EST)

@@ Line 16: / Line 16: @@
 ---
-I am having problems with [[ns_sha1]] returning sha1 hashes that differ from all other library implementations.
+I am having problems with [[ns_sha1]] returning sha1 hashes that differ from all other library implementations. -Caveman
--Caveman
+* Can you provide a short snippet of sample code (incl. sample data, and what you get as output) from ns_sha1 as well as one other library implementation, so we might be able to identify where the difference is coming from? ''-- [[User:Dossy|Dossy]] 07:10, 3 December 2005 (EST)''

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:06, 3 December 2005
Line 13:		Line 13:

	[[Dossy]] 27jul2004 - ''Damien, [http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.aolserver/10802 Tomasz Kosiak] asked the same question on the AOLserver mailing list and [http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.aolserver/10804 Jim Davidson] responded that commenting out the failing check you experienced may be safe. Tomasz then [http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.aolserver/10809 replied] that he'd followed Jim's advice, and it seems to be working just fine. Once I get some time on a AMD64 system, I'll do some testing and commit the change. For now, you can either make the same change Tomasz did, or wait.''		[[Dossy]] 27jul2004 - ''Damien, [http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.aolserver/10802 Tomasz Kosiak] asked the same question on the AOLserver mailing list and [http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.aolserver/10804 Jim Davidson] responded that commenting out the failing check you experienced may be safe. Tomasz then [http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.aolserver/10809 replied] that he'd followed Jim's advice, and it seems to be working just fine. Once I get some time on a AMD64 system, I'll do some testing and commit the change. For now, you can either make the same change Tomasz did, or wait.''
		+
		+	---
		+
		+	I am having problems with [[ns_sha1]] returning sha1 hashes that differ from all other library implementations.
		+
		+	-Caveman

← Older revision	Revision as of 15:05, 23 November 2009
(No difference)